Plaintiff and Defense Perspectives on Defensible AI Workflows
Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing discovery workflows, but are plaintiffs and defendants using it the same way?
In this candid discussion, leading eDiscovery practitioners from both sides of the “V” explore how AI is being applied in real-world litigation today, where it delivers value, where it introduces risk, and what legal teams need to know to ensure defensible outcomes.
Moderated by Jeff Johnson, Chief Innovation Officer at Purpose Legal, the panel features Leah Bays, Partner at Robbins Geller, and Tessa Jacob, Partner at Husch Blackwell, sharing their perspectives from the plaintiff and defense sides of complex litigation.
The discussion moves beyond AI headlines to focus on practical questions legal teams are facing today:
- Can GenAI replace search terms?
- How should AI-assisted review be validated?
- What level of transparency should parties provide regarding AI workflows?
- Are prompts discoverable?
- How are courts likely to apply existing TAR and eDiscovery case law to generative AI?
Viewers will gain valuable insights into how litigators use AI for document review, issue identification, early case analysis, and discovery strategy, while balancing accuracy, defensibility, cooperation, and cost considerations. The panel also explores emerging debates around prompt disclosure, validation methodologies, search term negotiations, and the evolving expectations of courts and opposing counsel.
Whether you represent plaintiffs, defendants, corporate legal departments, or law firms, this webinar offers a practical look at how AI is reshaping discovery from both sides of the litigation landscape.
For more information about AI in Discovery or to book time to speak with Jeff Johnson, contact us here.
